The Boardroom Review and Dissent

A boardroom review allows a table a way to assess their performance in a holistic manner. It assists tables in identifying weaknesses in their leadership relationships and the culture they operate in and also aspects of longevity. It is also a way to ensure that those who pay for membership at a table are properly equipped to fulfill their responsibilities.

This research area is still in the process of development however there are several challenges. The first is that the evidence available today has mixed results regarding how dissent shapes boards and how they function. While some studies report positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear effects, others find negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019) and mixed results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats, 2015; Minichilli et al. 2012) interactions between dissent as well as a board’s task performance.

Additionally, the existing research does not provide a deeper theoretical understanding of what drives the dynamics of the dissent. Future research should develop a more integrated theoretical approach to understand the underlying causes of this governance phenomenon. This could include the use of a configurational approach (Federo and Saz Carranza 2018; Schiell, Lewellyn, and Yan 2023) to help researchers boardroombook.com/what-is-a-do-questionnaire/ better understand how board attributes process, processes, and contexts are connected to the necessary and sufficient causality in governance phenomena.

Some studies use a narrow definition of disagreement but do not offer precise measurement methods. These studies are therefore vulnerable to measurement error. It would be beneficial to develop more robust methods to measure dissent in future studies.